Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Grading ...formerly Replacing an OM-10?

Subject: Re: [OM] Grading ...formerly Replacing an OM-10?
From: "Bruce Kolber" <bkolber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 20:25:29 -0400
Yup.....I guess what I'm saying is the items I recently got are marginally
"KEH Bargain" (70%) (nearly KEH Ugly) as opposed to the best of "KEH
Bargain" (79%) (nearly KEH Excellent).  I'm not complaining, since I feel I
got what I paid for.....just noting that I was formerly getting items that
were more like 79% and usually exceeded my expectations.

Bruce Kolber
St. Petersburg, FL  33715
USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Reese" <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Replacing an OM-10 -- with what?


> Michael Z. writes:
>
> << For example, a camera body that KEH describes as being in "EX-"
> condition, will often be in better shape than one characterized as "LN-"
> by most sellers. >>
>
> KEH doesn't have Ex-.  What is Ex- among some dealers is included in
> KEH=BGN.
>
> Bruce K. writes:
>
> << A few recent purchases of items graded "Bargain" have been pretty
> much as described....I would consider them as "user".....function fine
> but not very pretty (about a 6 cosmetically). >>
>
> A B&H "6" is a KEH=UG. A B&H "7" equals a KEH=BGN.
>
> Gary Reese
> Las Vegas, NV
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz