om52 and 0m60 do shown very little falloff, I think you must have it stop
down to F11.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye
> Conditions and usage may vary by user as may definition about whether it
is
> noticeable. A critical eye deliberately looking for any minute trace of
> falloff can usually find it with nearly any lens in nearly any photograph.
:-)
>
> Not noticeable (to me):
> http://johnlind.tripod.com/oly/gallery/om52.html
> http://johnlind.tripod.com/oly/gallery/om60.html
> (an "establishing shot" which I should redo using the 24mm,
> 35mm shift or a different perspective)
> http://johnlind.tripod.com/oly/gallery/om82.html
>
> Very noticeable:
> http://johnlind.tripod.com/oly/gallery/om57.html
> (the very nature of the subject material enhances the falloff)
>
> All are uncropped without any manipulation to correct for falloff
(attempts
> at it with some images have never been successful). I have others that
> fall between these two groups; they just happen to be what has been
scanned.
>
> -- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|