I tend to agree that if I was only going to have one, I'd have the 18. Just
a lot more useable lens.
However, if I had the 21, then I'd go for the 16. You wouldn't use it much,
but when you do..............
Tom
> Is it good? No, it is sweeeeeet! If you are not into the funky
> distortion, then this is the lens for you. I have almost considered
> giving up the fisheye because this lens *almost* has the same coverage
> as the 16 w/o the strange wrapping on the sides of the frame. If you
> got money to spend on just one, then I think it should be the 18/3.5.
>
>
> gries
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|