Good idea. Let's do it.
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Hammons <astaire@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 50 1.2 at Cameta
> Group,
>
> Should we have a mass-mailing to Cameta asking if this is the
> same lens they said was Mint- and sold to a person in Australia who
> then had to return it because of the huge amount of Fungus in it and
> took a hefty shipping charge loss in the process?
>
> I'm serious -- maybe something like that en-mass
> from our group would scare the p*ss out of Cameta.
>
> At least for a little while.
>
> Mark Hammons
>
>
>
> > BEWARE!!!
> >
> > I checked the photocopied reciept of the 'fungus farm' 50 f1.2 that I
> > bought off and subsequently returned to Cameta on the 14/5/2001. THIS IS
> > THE SAME LENS, obviously has probably been cleaned but I had it looked
at
> > professionally and the verdict was that the fungus removal had a high
> > likelihood of damaging or removing the coating entirely.
> >
> > They've knocked $20 off the price I had paid... not a good sign.
> >
> > Caveat Emptor.
> >
> > Oben
> >
> > At 01:21 PM Tuesday 24/07/2001, George wrote:
> > >Olympus Zuiko Auto-S 50mmf1.2 Ser.#104642-Later Multicoated
Version(Mint-)
> > >$279.
> > >
> > >Cameta new arrivals.
> > >
> > ><http://www.cameta.com>http://www.cameta.com
> > >
> > >No connection.
> > >
> > >GeoW
> >
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|