Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135

Subject: Re: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135
From: David <div2000@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 23:54:16 +0200
Hi,

I worked with this lens a lot and I had lots of experiences
with it. At f3,5 terribly soft; at f5,6 much better resolution,
best at f8 and f11! I changed it for my 180/2,8 ;-) but I took
good pictures with it. If you want to have a look to them...

http://victorian.fortunecity.com/byzantium/656/newom4ti.html

All the photos taken with telephoto, were using 135/3,5!!!

I´ll never forget it but I prefer now working with my 180/2,8
and my new Winder 2!

Dave

gries wrote:
> 
> Is there anyone who would like to give their opinion about the virtues
> of the 135/2.8 over the 3.5?  my disease is worsening, and I now believe
> that one is soon destined for my camera case....
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Unofficial Olympus web page
http://victorian.fortunecity.com/byzantium/656/index.html
Unofficial Olympus Gallery
http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/irissari/irissari.html
------------------------------------------------------------

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz