Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Tamron 90mm lens

Subject: Re: [OM] Tamron 90mm lens
From: "John Duggan" <john.duggan1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 20:16:24 +0100
 I strongly disagree!
                              In Practical Photography Aug1993 the Tamron
90mm f2.5 came out on MTF tests slightly behind the Canon macro ef 100 and
Nikon 105mm micro nikkor - BUT ahead of Minolta, Pentax, Sigma, Vivitar
series1 105 f2.5 and Elicar. Testers notes... Quite suprisingly,the edge
definition produced by this lens is marginally better than the centre.  It
can be used at all apertures confidently........What a beauty.  Quality
focusing,  construction and results at a very decent price.
I bought my 90mm macro f2.5 as a result of this test review and I must say
that my experience with this lens has confirmed the quality. The only
reservation I had about this lens was the polycarbonate collar above the
aperture ring. This has a transparent window through which you read the
distance scale. However this has stood up to 8yrs wear and tear with no
problems. My suggestion - If you get a chance try this lens out for
yourself, you might be pleasantly supprised!
                                                  Regards, John Duggan,
Wales, UK.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Hudson" <xyyc@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Tamron 90mm lens


> John Hudson wrote:

Over the last several months I have seen 35mm black and white and colour
8x10, 11x14, and 16x20 inch prints taken with a Tamron 90/2.8 [or 2.5?]
zoom
The lens was a piece of stout plastic and felt and looked very
> inferior compared to the Zuiko and Leitz lenses. Around here it retails
> for 300 or 400 $Cdn which perhaps indicates that one does not get much
> quality for the money!

. Compared to similar sized prints I shot
> > using an 85/2 on my my OM4T and a 90/2.8 Elmarit on my M3 the Tamron
> > prints were just plain awful ..........overly soft round the edges and
> > just not at all sharp. The visual quality of my Olympus and Leica prints
> > were too close in quality to discern one from the other. Based on this
> > limited exposure to the Tamron zoom it got a big failing grade.
> >
> > John Hudson
> > Vancouver, BC, Canada









< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz