Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] New book barely mentions OM

Subject: Re: [OM] New book barely mentions OM
From: "Skip Williams" <skipwilliamsom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 14:17:37 -0400
There are many other brands to consider when collecting other than the Nikon, Canon, Pentax, Minolta, Olympus, Alpa and Leicaflex mentioned. Obviously this guy was not very objective, the book poorly edited and vetted, and research or caveats not given as to the author's preferences and experience.

I can think of many other SLR's that merit consideration for collecting: Contax, Miranda, Konica, Zeiss/Icon, Practica, Topcon, Zenit, Exakta, Kiev to name a few.

Geez...it's surprising to see such poorly produced books as this today. Michael should get a copy of Ivor Matanle's two books or his series of articles in Amatuer Photographer, which I really enjoy. They talk much more about selecting and using cameras, and they cover a wide range of modern classics.

Skip


****** I M P O R T A N T   R E P L Y   I N F O ************
Please adddress ALL offlist messages to skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
This hotmail.com email address is ONLY used for this mailing list subscription and I will probably not notice any private messages addressed here.
***********************************************************



From: Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] New book barely mentions OM
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:10:42 -0700

Amherst Media has a new book out titled something like "How to Select
and Use Classic Cameras" by Michael Levy.  In his 35mm SLR section he
says only Nikon, Canon, Pentax, Minolta and Olympus SLR's should be
considered worth collecting and using.  But he contradicts himself later
on with Alpa and Leicaflex lust.  He devotes lots of text to the Nikon
F, but short changes everything else, including Olympus. To the Olympus
OM, he devotes one paragraph, in which he says he had a (presumably
used) OM-1, but it "died" after 2 years.  (Why didn't you fix it,
Michael?).  But he really liked the "105mm" Olympus lens. Huh?  A 105mm
Olympus lens?

Golly gee, another poorly edited book (there are lots of other
problems).  I think it even had a copyright date of 2002.  It's at
Border's.

BTW, I'd consider a Konica over a Minolta SLR any day of the week!

Gary Reese
Las Vegas, NV


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz