Re: [OM] B&W film

[John Pendley]

Well, most of us base our conclusions on inadequate testing of development 
times (according to your previous post).  Who can trust anything we say?  I 
would only add that metering technique is as important.  Believe it or not, 
I've done both kinds of testing.
John

> Wow that's a remarkably high EI for FP4. Was this a typo or could you tell
> us how you came up with that value?  For normal contrast (sheet FP4+), I
> use EI64 with Xtol and can't imagine how our measurements could be off by
> a factor of 4x!
>
> > Tri-X is a good film in large format, but I don't really like it in 35mm.
> As you probably know, but others may not, Tri-X in 120 and sheet is a 
> different
> emulsion than the 35mm rolls which our Olympi require... I thought this
> was not tru for FP4+.
>
> Eric Pederson
> epederso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (no "n" in "epederso")
> Professional home page:
>         http://logos.uoregon.edu/uoling/faculty/pederson/pederson.html
> Personal home page:
>         http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~epederso/
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >