Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: Least Common Denominator/Photofinishing/Reccomendations?

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Least Common Denominator/Photofinishing/Reccomendations?
From: Jim Couch <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:17:34 -0700
Thanks for the info. I am looking forward to hearing what you think of the
prints from Holland. I am definitely interested in display quality prints am
wanting to print some of my better images for display in my home (something my
wife has wanted for years) and am concerned about both visual and archival
quality, so the custom printing is what I am looking at. As far as I am
concerned, if I am going to go to all the trouble to do a large (8x10+) print, I
want to do it right. while it is not a case of cost is no object, I will be
living with these prints on my walls for many years, it will be cheaper in the
long run to do it right once, rather than have to do it over again in a couple
of years because the print is dissatisfying, or does not hold up.

Jim Couch

"John A. Lind" wrote:

> The four I'm having done by Holland are the first Ilfo's for me.  Want to
> see how they look, and should be the strongest of the submissions if they
> print well.  Asked on the list quite a number of months ago about Holland
> when I was exploring Ilfochrome.  Got high marks from a number of Texas
> list members.  They also offer a "commercial" grade ilfochrome which is
> less expensive than a "custom" print (for which one pays for cropping,
> dodging and burning whether you ask for it or not).


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz