> > actualy claim a plastic N90 could possibly be more durable
> or reliable
> > than an OM-4 tells me he is a walking Nik*n ad.
But I remember in another article by GR, that he complained
bitterly about the inability to blindly operate his
wonderbricks. In that article he actually made a sideways
compliment to the OM-4T.
He really is correct about the reliability issue. I personally
have looked at this and if/when I go full-time, it will most
likely be with Nikon (if 35mm). One primary issue is rental and
loaner gear. I can get nearly any lens I want at anytime in
nearly any location with Nikon.
Isn't that article a bit old? I thought he stopped using the F4
(not reliable enough) long ago and got numerous F5s and low end
Nikons. Personally, I think the F4/N90s is nearly worthless
when compared to the F5/F100. I'd take an EOS-1n over either F4
or N90s anyday.
KN
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|