Damon
I have the 300/4.5, and it is a lovely lens. However, I don't use it
as much as my 200/4. I suggest that the 300/4.5 is nearly a
specialist lens and that you won't need it before you have a 200 ...
or perhaps a wide-angle (the 35/2.8 and 28/2.8 are good, small
lenses).
Now, on the other hand, if you were to find a 300/4.5 cheap and in
good nick, well I shouldn't worry about *need* and just snap it up
;-).
Chris
[my first paragraph was intended to be sensible advice; my second was
what I sometimes do anyway :>)]
At 19:26 +1000 3/9/01, Damon Wood wrote:
Can anyone tell me the pros and cons of this lens.
I am considering a bid to a seller. Bidding starts at
AU $250. Is it worth getting as I only have 2 Zuiko's,
a 50mm 1.4 and 135mm 2.8 and I wouldnt mind a large
telephoto.
Cheers
=====
Damon Wood
--
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, England.
+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|