ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!

Subject:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!
From:	Jim Couch <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2001 07:53:31 -0700

I have used both T32s and T20s with the OM2 without a problem. .

Jim Couch

DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx wrote:

> teh T32 goes with an OM2n, not an OM2..for the OM2 you need the older 318.(is
> that the number?? it's late!)
>
> Susan Steele


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Larry Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, John Hermanson Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Charles Loeven Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Henrik Dahl Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, c.e.packard Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, andrew fildes Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch <= Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, John Hermanson Re: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Bill Stanke Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Larry Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Garth Wood Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Charles Loeven [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Please check a link for me on the UOWPG, Charles Loeven
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Mickey Trageser
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, John Hermanson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]