Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!

Subject: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!
From: "Mickey Trageser" <mickeytr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:25:04 -0400
While the introduction of the 2n is recorded as 1979, the actual
availability in many stores may have been sometime in 1980. There is no
month associated with the year in the reference data.
-Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!


> Interesting, as I bought my last OM-2 in the summer of 79, when I worked
in
> a camera store in San Diego.  That must have been when I bought the T32 as
> well.  We never had any OM-2n bodies, or I would have bought one. The body
> must have come out later in the year.
>
> On the other hand, the OM-2 HAD to have been designed for the T-flash, or
> the circuitry wouldn't have been able to handle the Shoe 3.
>
> Tom> in my records I have a writen timeline of my own from my old
magazines,
> etc,
> > and I have written down that both the T-32 and the Om2n were issued in
> 1979,
> > vs. 1975 for the OM2.
> >
> > Susan Steele
> > Virginia USA
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz