Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Digital question; when does touch-up become cheating?

Subject: Re: [OM] Digital question; when does touch-up become cheating?
From: Roger Wesson <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:35:50 +0100
> What exactly does the unsharp mask do to "restore original appearance"?
> Doesn't it make the picture, eh well... unsharp?
> 
> Henrik Dahl

No idea what 'Unsharp Mask' does in Photoshop, but I'm pretty sure it's
not what it does in the darkroom.  It's a technique used to fantastic
effect by David Malin, to extract more information from astronomical
negatives.  He makes a blurred positive of his original monochrome
negative, then copies the original through the unsharp mask, which gives
a print showing much more of the dynamic range of the negative than is
normally possible.  See these pages for before and after examples:

http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/AAO/images/captions/aat019b.html (before)
http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/AAO/images/captions/aat019a.html (after)

And this page for technical info:

http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/AAO/images/general/technical.html

Nothing to do with actually sharpening the image, and I've no idea why
photoshop calls a sharpening filter a misleading name which refers to an
entirely different effect!

Anyway, that was a bit of an aside, really.  Image sharpness is lost
when you scan because you are undersampling the image - ie putting
several bits of image information into each pixel.  The information is
merged and a loss of sharpness results.  All these sharpening filters
and whatnot don't really restore anything, they just make it look
better, purely cosmetically.

Roger

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz