I'd agree with the assessment. Both fine lenses. The 75-150 wins on the
'small and light' scale, but the 65-200 has greater reach and is, IMHO,
sharper.
Either one would be a great buy and KEH is very reputable.
Tom
> on 9/26/01 12:32 AM, Bob at bokap1@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > am thinking of buying a 65-200 f4 Zoom from KEH. Do you think is a good
> > lens or should I buy another 200 f4.
> > Bob
>
> Bob,
>
> The 65-200/4 is an excellent lens and it is one of my favorites. I would
> strongly recommend it. The 75-150/4 is a good choice too and is much
> smaller and lighter. Both excellent choices, but I sold my 75-150 because
I
> didn't use it at all after I got the 65-200.
>
> Mike
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|