The tech name of the new Sensia (called only "Sensia", not "Sensia II")
remain RA.
Pop. Phot. says ... "dropped the II, the tweaked emulsions are back to
Sensia, sans numeral".
Also I have read on other magazine the new Sensia is better than the Sensia
II on sharpness and granularity. Is clear the old Sensia II don´t have the
granularity level of the Provia 100F. Maybe this new "Sensia" is the Provia
100F for amateur...with a bit more of contrast.
Ángel Lobo.
----- Original Message -----
From: C.H.Ling <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Sensia II vs. Provia. Was: Kodachrome vs Provia
I was talking about Sensia II (RA), I don't know about the 3rd gen you
are talking about. How does it call? RA II or Sensia III?
C.H.Ling
Angel Lobo wrote:
>
> C.H.Long wrote:
>
> > I think you have missed the Fujifilm test data, they have 1.6:1 also.
> > The resolution for Provia F is 60lp/mm and Sensia II is 55lp/mm.
>
> Are you talking of Sensia II or about the new " Sensia " (3rd generation)
?
>
> According to Pop.Phot. (July 2001) "89 color film compared", Provia 100F
and
> this new Sensia have the same parameters on Resolution, Sharpness, Color
> Saturation, Granularity and Expos. Latitud, except for the contrast, where
> the Provia 100 F is "Med" and Sensia is "High".
>
> I´m now testing both films side by side.
>
> Ángel Lobo.
> Cuenca ( Spain )
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|