Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] no more carryons?

Subject: Re: [OM] no more carryons?
From: Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:30:31 +0100
Nor my old one Siddiq.  But my gilet has pretty large pockets at the back.

And that was a poor attempt at stirring with SUV content - IMO ;-).

Chris

At 18:42 -0700 27/9/01, Acer V wrote:
9/27/01 6:37:07 PM, ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

In <p05100300b7d876107bea@[195.74.112.218]>, on 09/27/01 at 07:30 AM,
   Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

Well at least our OMs are generally small enough to carry in pockets
or a special gilet (OM content).

What's a gilet?

no such word in the 'murrican dictionary.. but i think om's aren't small enough to pocket carry (unless i suppose you've got the baggy trousers of genghis khan (token GK content!).... or if you mean the "seat back" pockets or "nooks and crannies" pockets in your SUV (token SUV
content). couldn't resist ;)

--
<|_:-)_|>

C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, England.

+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
... a nascent photo library.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz