ML Archiv: Re: [OM] S# 1000000?

Subject:	Re: [OM] S# 1000000?
From:	"Craig Henrikson" <chenriks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 4 Oct 2001 09:19:15 -0400

Tom and John -- Which is why I was a bit careful in my message -- I thought
that might be the case.

Craig

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] S# 1000000?


> I don't think the box or manual ever said 2n.  The manual always says 2,
but
> the pictures inside are a 2n.
>
> Tom
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Poll on Focusing Screens, (continued) Re: [OM] Poll on Focusing Screens, Bruce Hamm [OM] Zuiko 50 mm f1.4 'M' lens, Neal Jones Re: [OM] Zuiko 50 mm f1.4 'M' lens, Mark Dapoz Re: [OM] Zuiko 50 mm f1.4 'M' lens, Tom A. Trottier [OM] S# 1000000?, Daan Kalmeijer RE: [OM] S# 1000000?, Olaf Greve Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, John Hermanson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Craig Henrikson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, John Hermanson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Craig Henrikson <= Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Daan Kalmeijer Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Craig Henrikson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Tom A. Trottier Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Daryl Hurley Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, John Hermanson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Daryl Hurley Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, andrew fildes

Previous by Date:	[OM] OT, Timpe, Jim
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Bruce Hamm
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Tom Scales
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Hans van Veluwen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]