16/3.5 before a 18/3.5?
Does anyone have good sample photos taken with a 16/3.5?
With a 18/3.5 the foreground at your feet is a very important part of the
picture.
Squatting down seems to help make the lower foreground more interesting ...
comments from others?
Perhaps with the fisheye the scene must be chosen to work with the distortion. I
have seen only a few fisheye pictures I liked. I would really enjoy seeing what
regular users do with them.
-jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
snip snip
> So, if I was buying, I'd buy the 21/3.5 first. If you find it a focal length
> you love (which I do), trade up to a 21/2. Consider the 18/3.5 last, as it
> is more of a specialty lens, and go for a 16/3.5 first.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|