--- "Jeffrey R. Keller" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for the thoughts. The two TOPE entries that
> were pointed
> out after your email really seem to support what
> you're saying.
> I've never been happy with the barrel distortion in
> the photos I've
> seen, but it looks like with careful composition it
> can be gold.
>
> Thanks again,
> -jeff
Here's a couple of shots of the Bixby Bridge in Big
Sur, Calif.
This first one was taken with the 21/3.5 and the
second one was taken with the 16/3.5:
http://members.aol.com:/wkato/images/26301612.jpg
http://members.aol.com:/wkato/images/26301611.jpg
Note that even with the 16mm any line converging on
the center of the picture are straight (although
foreshortened)but all the rest that are perpendicular
to the radial lines from the center are distorted. But
with a careful composition, it just looks weird but
without an obvious fisheye look.
Warren
=====
Warren Xato
For where to go when you know when
-PhotoDates-and-Places@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
