Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 16/3.5

Subject: Re: [OM] 16/3.5
From: "W.Xato" <xato0@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 10:25:07 -0800 (PST)
--- Gary Edwards <garyetx@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
<<<Both are  nice shots, Warren, but I prefer the 16,
don't you?
Gary>>>

Well, yeah. Unabashedly, yes. It's extremely
contrasty, sharp and gives a totally unique view of
the world. And if you use it for scenics, it's not
fishy at all.

Wind caves at Anza Borrego Desert State Park
http://members.aol.com:/wkato/images/anzab/10700b26.jpg
These oak branches at the top of this photo were
beyond over my had and the holly berries were about 9
inches from the lens:
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/wkato/myhomepage/holly01v.jpg

Or you can go for the distorted effect at Moro Rock in
Sequoia NP.
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/wkato/images/sequoia.jpg
Or weird buildings in downtown Los Angeles:
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/wkato/images/buildings.jpg

I still haven't fired up Dersch's distortion
straightening program. What will I end up with? I
guess it will look like a stretched rubber sheet
that's been pulled from all 4 corners.

Warren



=====
Warren Xato

For where to go when you know when
-PhotoDates-and-Places@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz