ML Archiv: Re: [OM] PICS

Subject:	Re: [OM] PICS
From:	DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx
Date:	Thu, 8 Nov 2001 10:22:35 EST

In a message dated 11/7/01 8:04:25 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:


>  know it's no E-10/20, but I'm pleased 

We're having a ball with our 4040.  I agree, Tom, it appears to have the same 
CCD and the resultant photos are really nice.  I am still learning how to use 
Photoshop and am especially flumaxed bythe huge files it generates.  They 
gotta be big to have all that color and detail, huh. (g)

Dave Dougherty

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] PICS, (continued) Re: [OM] PICS, John Hermanson [OM] FL40, Tom Scales Re: [OM] FL40, John Hermanson Re: [OM] PICS, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] PICS, John Hermanson Re: [OM] Printing, John Hermanson Re: [OM] Printing, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Printing, John Pendley Re: [OM] Printing, John Pendley Re: [OM] Printing, Tom Scales Re: [OM] PICS, DAVDOU9211 <= Re: [OM] PICS, John Hermanson RE: [OM] PICS, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] PICS, DAVDOU9211 Re: [OM] PICS, DAVDOU9211 RE: [OM] PICS, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] PICS, Tom Scales Re: [OM] PICS - memory for editing photos, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] PICS - memory for editing photos, Tom Scales Re: [OM] PICS - memory for editing photos, Matt Crawley Re: [OM] PICS - memory for editing photos, M. Royer

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] E-20 - more observations -- realistically this is OT, Tom Scales
Next by Date:	RE: [OM] PICS, Timpe, Jim
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Printing, Tom Scales
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] PICS, John Hermanson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]