Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Lenses: The Good, the Bad, and the Average.

Subject: Re: [OM] Lenses: The Good, the Bad, and the Average.
From: Jim Couch <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 22:23:49 -0800
The 24mm should work fine with the Cokin P filters as is (no trimming.ect) I 
have
been threatening to do some actual tests on both the 24 qnd the 18 but haven't
gotten around to it. I will try to do some this next week if things slow down 
for
me.

Jim Couch

Dean wrote:

> >2) if you're a poor student or "hemhorroging" money (a new expr I learned
> >from the list the other day, means you have a bunch, I think)
>
> I'm far from hemorrhaging $. In fact, if I could get a transfusion I would!
>
> >24 mm. I use the 24/2.8 SC (yes, Ken it's a silvernoze), with a lot of
> >joy. It's compact and light and in my non-professional eyes very sharp.
> >The 24/2 is one stop faster and probably even sharper, but also slightly
> >heavier and twice the price. The 24mm is ideal for scenics and IMHO portraits
>
> Hmm. I really want a 24mm that will not vignette with a Cokin P filter -
> with all but one filter thread cut off, and a Polarizer. Will these work?
>
> thanks to everyone for the input. it is appreciated.
>
> -dean
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

--
Jim Couch
Tacoma, WA USA



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz