<<
The OM-3Ti is a very expensive camera for what it has to offer. The only
extra (but unique) feature it has compared to other models is enhanced
TTL/OTF flash in the 1-1/60s range with fill-in control. Hardly something
most OM users can justify to themselves (and to their spouses). Olympus
would have made a better marketing move if it had released the 'definite OM
body' that Maitani had planned (as he told in an interview).
>>
For my wishes, it would be better an equivalent of a Ni*on FM3A. In Italy
it sells for the half of a OM-4Ti,
and for that money you have an electronic AND a mechanical camera. Or they
could have made an
enhanced OM-1 (the Oly 2000 was not a system camera, and too plastic/less
durable).
In my opinion there is enough room for a good mechanical camera, and Ni*on
know that.
By the way, I cannot explain why the sync time (1/60) is still the same in
the modern cameras (OM-3/4)
whith shorter exposure time (1/2000) than the old ones (OM-1) with 1/1000.
Ralf Loi
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|