Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Scanning quality

Subject: Re: [OM] Scanning quality
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 07:49:37 -0600
There's not a huge difference in the results.  The Polaroid may bring out
the shadows marginally better, but it is small.  The Nikon is much more
sensitive to focus issues than the Polaroid, and bowed film can have focus
problems  -- that's more anecdote than experience, as my results have been
good.

The big difference is in overall useability.  I have the roll film adapter
for the Nikon.  I can stick in one end of the film strip, walk away and come
back to 36 scanned pictures.  It's a lot more work with the Polaroid.  If
Polaroid had ever introduced the rumored roll film adapter, I never would
have switched -- now they have finally said they never will.

So, the SS4000 is the right buy, as it is SO much cheaper.

Tom
From: <Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


> How do the Nikons and Polaroids compare?
> Are you using VueScan?
>
> Tom
>
> On Thursday, December 06, 2001 at 22:31, Tom Scales
> <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote re "Re: [OM] Scanning quality" saying:
>
> > I do.  I have owned four different film scanners, including two at
4000dpi,
> > the Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 and the Nikon LS-4000 (my current scanner).
I
> > also have, on loan from Polaroid, a Sprinscan 4000+ (not sure if they
even
> > have it in production yet).
> >
> > I've also used a variety of flatbeds.  Right now, my wife has an HP
6350C,
> > which is a pretty decent scanner.
> >
> > The difference is HUGE.
> >
> > The 4000dpi filmescanners, in 16-bit mode, generate a 120MB Tiff file,
at
> > approximately 5500x3500 pixels.  The flatbed might generate files that
big,
> > but the results are limited by the print -- to a much lower quality.
> >
> > More discussion is beyond this list, but to reinforce and summarize.
> >
> > The film scanner is better. Much better.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > > Do you who have the experience notice a HUGE difference between
> > > scanned prints and scanned negatives? Or is the difference
> > > "neglectable"?
> > >
> > > Henrik Dahl
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz