Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Scanning quality

Subject: Re: [OM] Scanning quality
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 07:50:41 -0600
The only reason I said TIFF was because that is what the scanner creates.

Tom

: "Conrad Vogel

> A PNG (1000ssless) file would be better for archiving than a TIFF.
>
> They are usually about 700f the size of TIFF files, and have other
> advantages:
>
> http://www.atalasoft.com/PNG.html
> http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/
>
>
> Tom Scales wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >The 4000dpi filmescanners, in 16-bit mode, generate a 120MB Tiff file, at
> >approximately 5500x3500 pixels.  The flatbed might generate files that
big,
> >but the results are limited by the print -- to a much lower quality.
> >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz