Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?

Subject: RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?
From: "Daniel J. Mitchell" <DanielMitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:49:28 -0700
> Worth noting is that you can buy the 200/4, 200/5, and 180/2.8 with
> little risk of losing more than shipping on a re-sale. There's really
> no reason not to buy them all and then sell the one or two you like
> least. That's what I did, and it sure was nice to shoot them side by
> side.

 That would be great, except that I'm in Canada, so I lose more on shipping
(rather, duty) than you'd think. Otherwise I'd definitely be tempted by
something like that. Heck, they're all available locally, now that I think
of it (there's a rather overpriced 180/2.8 around here) but I'd end up
rather more out of pocket than I'd like in the interim period -- and I doubt
the local shops have the same try-before-you-buy attitude that some folks
around here do, sadly.

 Still, it's definitely a nice idea -- once Xmas has been and gone and I
have no other immediate drains on cashflow, I'm very tempted..

 -- dan

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz