ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?

from Joel Wilcox

Subject:	Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?
From:	Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:59:24 -0600

At 03:05 PM 12/13/2001 -0800, you wrote:

But I was able to use my tripod.  Gotta make sure you have your
quick-release plates with you and not in the back of your Volvo.

AG-Schnozz


Hey, I resemble that!

Joel W.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, (continued) Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Barry B. Bean Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Bill Stanke Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Tom Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, W.Xato Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Jim Couch Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Ken N Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Richard F. Man Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, John A. Lind Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Terry and Tracey Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Joel Wilcox <= Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Pandionhalietius Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Barry B. Bean Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Bachofen Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, dreammoose RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, James N. McBride RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5? vs 650-1300/?, Tom RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5? vs 650-1300/?, James N. McBride Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, dreammoose Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Bruce Hamm

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OM macro systems, M. Royer
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OM macro systems, Joel Wilcox
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Terry and Tracey
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Tom Scales
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]