Although the extension tubes are less costly, because
magification is basically a function of amount of
extension, the 65-116 wins out because of its ease of
use in the field.
Warren
--- "Richard F. Man" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So what are the pros and cons for macro work with
> these two options? My
> interests would be more on field works (insects
> etc.) rather than small
> stationary objects. Thanks!
>
> // richard http://www.imagecraft.com
> [ For technical support, please include all previous
> replies in your msgs. ]
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|