Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] teleconverter elements..how many is good?

Subject: Re: [OM] teleconverter elements..how many is good?
From: "John A. Prosper" <JAProsper@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:45:38 -0800
The number of elements necessary for a quality teleconverter depends on the
magnification level of the TC.  For 1.4x TCs, 4 or 5 elements are
sufficient.  Hence, the Zuiko 1.4x TC sports 5 elements.  For 2x TCs, what
Jim said is true.  I don't think there ever was a quality 3x TC made.

Regards,
John


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Couch" <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


> The 7 element Vivitar has a much better reputation than the 4 element.
> with teleconvertors the 7 element convertors are generally better. The
> extra elements allow for better correction of various aberrations.
>
> Jim Couch
>
> William Clark wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> >         I just noticed that my 2 Vivitar MC teleconverters are a bit
> > different.  I have the Macro-focusing one (7 elements in 5 groups) and
> > a non-macro one with 4 elements in 4 groups (both teleconverters are
> > 2X).  Which one is better?  I am not sure what an extra group and more
> > elements give you.  Would the extra group impede light transfer in
> > astrophotography?  Thanks for any help....
> >
> > -Bill
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz