chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> I don't think a pro lens is designed to be able to survive from drop, my
> friend dropped a 28-70/2.8 Canon to ground and it turn into two pieces.
> Your argument is ridiculous, I haven't said anything about pro lens, I just
> said smaller lens is cheap to make, the most expensive item of a lens is
> lens elements, smaller lens element is cheaper.
>
My argument is ridiculous? Forget it, C.H., you don't even understand what I
was referring to.
George S.
> ou think a 28-70/2.8 for 35mm film camera is cheaper than equivalent focal
> length zoom for a DC with 4/3" CCD????
>
> C.H.Ling
>
I have NO idea what you mean by THAT one. Of course I don't think so.
|