Generally I do prefer the 36 exposure film. More shots/$$. There are times
when I wish I had used a shorter roll. But if I really need to change films,
I do just that. Roll back the remaining film and have it processed. Use a
new roll for the new purpose. Even with 24's I sometimes have to do the
same. I don't see it as a big issue.
Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: Olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: [OM] 24 vs 36 exposure debate
> Ok, I'm about to head out for a "Grandma's cooking, grandkids invited
only"
> luncheon..
>
> Here's the question I have for you all. When I was on vacation in taiwan,
> they only sold rolls of 36 in taiwan, there are no 24's, but since I was
> clicking away like an idiot, I was happy to buy longer rolls, so I don't
> have to change as often.. But now, I'm stuck with half a roll of 36 left
in
> my camera of Fuji Superia, to shoot an indoor luncheon.. arrrg...
>
> So the 24 shot roll offers a better chance of finishing up a roll so I can
> change to something else, but the 36 is a little bit less film to carry
when
> I'm on vacation..
>
> I'd like to hear your preferences and the justifications (if any)..
>
> Albert
>
> FUD Dispell:: Someone told me pictures taken from a 36roll is worse
quality
> than a 24, because of the roll size?? I can't imagine this being true??
> Someone dispell this FUD for me?? Thanks.
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|