| Subject: | Re: [OM] Polarizer for the 18mm/3.5? |
|---|---|
| From: | Jim Couch <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 02 Jan 2002 19:40:02 -0800 |
Yes they do! Jim Couch James M Costello wrote: > I second the endorsement for Heliopan. In addition, I think that their > new "thin" polarizers have outboard female threading allowing you to > stack. > > Jamie Costello > Fort Myers, FL < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 24 vs 36 exposure debate, Jim Couch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] cos^4 explanation, Gregg Iverson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Polarizer for the 18mm/3.5?, James M Costello |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] In search of 90mm F2 Macro, Dave Shupe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |