Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: 24-exp versus 36 exp debate.

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: 24-exp versus 36 exp debate.
From: Jim Couch <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 20:25:46 -0800
Yep, 20 exposure rolls did exist at one time, so did 12 in some films. Both
are now long gone. Both are  handy sizes to have for some things.

Jim Couch

Scott Gomez wrote:

> Personally, I'd like to see 20 exp. rolls. Seems to me that used to be an
> available length, but that could be a dead brain cell, now days. 36 is too
> long. Even 24 is sometimes more than I want.
>
> All that said, I often end up with 36s just because that's the only way to
> get the film I want to use. It's really difficult for me to use up 36
> exposures in a short time, though. I tend to be pretty miserly with my
> shooting.
>
> I hate pulling a roll, inexpensive or not. Offends my Scottish genes right
> to the core.
>
> ---
> Scott Gomez


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz