Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36

Subject: Re: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36
From: Larry <Halpert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 03:31:44 -0500
You still have to do that on pro-polaroid back B&W films.

Larry

Mickey Trageser wrote:

> OK Scott. So now you're going to tell us you remember when you had to spread
> a protective coating on Polaroid pictures, and they were black and white!
> (oops, I remember....)
> -Mickey
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Gomez" <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:39 PM
> Subject: RE: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36
>
> > I'm too young?! That's the first time someone's told me that in at least
> 10
> > years. :-)
> >
> > I used to shoot 20 exp. rolls. It is just so long ago now that I wasn't
> sure
> > I remembered correctly.
> >
> > ---
> > Scott
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sue Pearce [mailto:bspearce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Subject: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36
> >
> > First, to Scott, youy brain is ok, you're just too young. Of course, film
> > was once 20 and 36. Then, one company added 4 exposures, "at no extra
> cost"
> > and then everyone did.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Bill Pearce
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz