| Subject: | Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:04:20 -0600 |
The 100/2.8 is an amazing lens. The more amazing thing is that the 100/2 is 'better'. A top contender... Tom From: "Jim L'Hommedieu (Lama)" <snip> > The 100mm f/2.8 is the sharpest lens I've ever used. <snip> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8, Tom Scales |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Digital woes, Charles Sdunek |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8, Jim L'Hommedieu (Lama) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8, dreammoose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |