| Subject: | Re: [OM] Digital camera downfalls |
|---|---|
| From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:09:23 -0800 |
Too bad about your digital camera losseven though the "wrong" brand. :-)If the heightened security for travel continues, digital may end up being the default for travelers because it is not damaged by Xrays. -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8, Steve Goss |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Re: Digital v real photography - slightly OT and long, Winsor Crosby |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Digital camera downfalls, John Wheeler |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Digital camera downfalls, Daniel J. Mitchell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |