| Subject: | RE: [OM] Follow-up: Eyecup with Diopter Correction |
|---|---|
| From: | Scott Gomez <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:39:28 -0800 |
Beats me. It hasn't changed in a long while, so far as I've seen. --- Scott -----Original Message----- From: Winsor Crosby [mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Subject: Re: [OM] Follow-up: Eyecup with Diopter Correction That would be a nice addition to the FAQ. Who keeps that up? -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8, andrew fildes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8, C.H.Ling |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Follow-up: Eyecup with Diopter Correction, Winsor Crosby |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] What's wrong with my OM4?, Steve Goss |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |