Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm?

Subject: Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm?
From: "Olympus" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:25:14 -0800
Should be 60x45..  Sorry.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Winsor Crosby" <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] 6x4.5 compared to 35mm?


> >  > > I'm just curious, how much will I gain going from 35mm to 645
> >>  > format?  Will I notice the difference, or not really until I pass
the
> >8x10
> >>  > threshold?
> >
> >Tacking on to your answer since I don't have the original...
> >
> >Simply figuring the size gives a mean of 1770% larger original image.
> >Not necessarily 1770% better but, with much _larger_ possiblilties.
> >
> >35mm =   24mm x  36mm
> >6x4.5 =   600mm x 450mm
> >
>
> Let me see. That would give you an 18 inch by 24 inch contact print.
> Cool. How big is the camera?
> --
> Winsor Crosby
> Long Beach, California
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz