| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-3 |
|---|---|
| From: | Mark Dapoz <md@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:13:10 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Winsor Crosby wrote:
> Well, that explains its extra cost - good paint.
It's not paint, it's some kind of an anodizing. The finish is just gorgeous,
I imagine the cost of producing it is significantly higher than the painted
covers.
-mark
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Shooting indoor sports?, Michael Darling |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-3, Stephan VAN DEN ZEGEL |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-3, Winsor Crosby |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-3, Stephan VAN DEN ZEGEL |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |