the 90mm/f2.0 is hard to come by, great size, very good lens. I have the
Tokina 90mm/f2.5 macro, and it's tack sharp. So if you can't find a Zuiko
90mm (or can't afford one, as such is the case with me) I paid $225 for my
Tokina, and from the tests, it might be a bit sharper than the Zuiko. It's
got a solid bulletproof construction also, so don't overlook the tokina if
the zuiko is not available... Also, that's $200+ vs. $700+ so it's a lot of
extra change in your pocket for the difference...
Albert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Müller" <thomu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject: [OM] your experience with 2,0/90 macro?
Dear all,
I´m new on this list, so I´m not sure whether this is the proper way to
pose a question. I´ll see whether it will work.
I´m proud owner of an OM4Ti. I was thinking to buy a 2,0/90 or 2,0/100
lens, mainly for portrait, but also with the idea to do some close-up or
detail.
Could you let me know what your experience is with these lenses, please.
Thomas
Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine
AG Medical Genetics
Robert-Rössle-Str. 10
13125 Berlin
Germany
phone: 49 30 9406 3359
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|