Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Which Auto Extension tube for the 100/2 for Macro?

Subject: Re: [OM] Which Auto Extension tube for the 100/2 for Macro?
From: "M. Royer" <royer007@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:58:46 -0800 (PST)
The 90/2 if you are going to do regular macro. This
lens goes to 1/2 lifesize normally, the 100/2 goes to
1/5 lifesize normally. It would take a 30mm extension
tube to get to 1/2 lifesize with the 100/2. The 100/2
is a cheaper lens, but not that much cheaper
considering. ($500-600 vs $650-750). Both are great
lenses, the 90 is IMHO more versatile though.

Mark Lloyd

--- james olson <james_olson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've been reading the debates about the 90/2 vs. the
> 100/2... and I've been 
> looking into the Auto Extension Tubes...
> 
> If I was to buy just one, which should it be for
> regular Macro work?  
> (Flowers, etc.)
> 
> The above is in direct reference to the 100/2.
> 
> Thanks, James.
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz