Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Why bigger images are better 3

Subject: Re: [OM] Why bigger images are better 3
From: Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:41:36 -0500
Dave,

At 4:03 PM +0000 1/21/02, olympus-digest wrote:
>
>Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:48:20 EST
>From: DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [OM] Why bigger images are better
>
>Back in the 50's I remember an article in HOTROD Magazine in which a Physicist 
>"proved" beyone a mathematical doubt that it was impossible for a dragster to 
>exceed 165mph in the quarter mile ...

Heavier than air flight is also impossible....


>My Christmas pictures were taken with a 4.1M Pixel camera and they rival 
>anything I have been able to produce with film and pro processing; and I have 
>gotten some damn fine results from film and pro processing.
>
>We have enlarged the photos to 8 x 10 and they are beautiful, sharp and rich 
>in color.  
>
>I am anxiously awaiting the arrival of a film scanner.  Then I will have the 
>best of both worlds.  But to suggest that the latest generation of digital 
>cameras produce results analagous to a throw away camera or worse is both ill 
>informed and born of using a comparison unfair to both sides of the equation.

I don't get it.  You have very nice equipment.  What does your equipment have 
to do with a comparison between two lowest-end cameras, one film, the other 
digital?

Joe


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [OM] Why bigger images are better 3, Joe Gwinn <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz