Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Forgive me, I have slipped....or I think I did a Fang....

Subject: Re: [OM] Forgive me, I have slipped....or I think I did a Fang....
From: "Bernd Moeller" <dsl33687a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:16:32 +0100
Hej Thomas,

It looks like you are in BIG trouble. Zuikoholism (can anybody please confirm 
this?) develops in steps, sometimes bigger, sometimes smaller. This sounds like 
a big step.

Congratulations anyway - it looks like a not so moderate Fang.

Best regards

Bernd Moeller

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thomas Heide Clausen" <voop@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Zuikoholics Anonymous" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:05 AM
Subject: [OM] Forgive me, I have slipped....or I think I did a Fang....


> Hiya,
> 
> Although I almost assured everyone that I had my zuikoholism in a firm
> grip, I think the prospects of a good Fang made me slip seriously,
> snow-balling into almost Scales' proportions. I need to confess....no,
> wait..."share" my experience...;)
> 
> First, I got my hands on a MINT OM1n (it turned out), with the only
> problem of the meter being a little off. This is a beauty, it looks as if
> it came right out of the box, and the mechanics sound really healthy. It
> came with the usual 50/1.8 optical bodycap. 
> 
> Secondly, I also got around a NIB varimagnifinder. Yes, NIB. Beauty. Not
> that I knew what I would use it for (yet - more to come...), but....
> 
> For the above lot I paid about USD 110. For all I am concirned, that's a
> very good price for a MINT om1n alone, no? A Fang? Can I be admitted to
> the exclusive DFBH-club based on that???
> 
> This triggered that I placed a bid on a danish auction site for an OM20
> w. 50/1.8 and two 135mm's (one Olympus - not sure if it is 3.5 or 2.8
> since I haven't received it). It was described to be in good shape,
> and the price I won with was about USD50.
>  
> Next, I saw a 35/2.0 and an 135/2.8 for sale. Not really a Fang,
> but not expensive either. The 35/2.0 was about USD100 and the
> 135/2.8 was about USD40. The lenses are very well cared for, so I think
> they will do me good service, I think fair prices still, no?
> 
> Anyways, now I had a varimagnifier....so fortunately, the same guy who had
> the 35/2.0 also had an auto-bellows, a dia-copyer, a couple of
> extension tubes and the macrophoto-stand. Ohh, and two eyecups and some
> focusing screens (1-10 and 1-4, I think it was).....so now I am scheduling
> to pick all that this friday. There were a couple of other things
> (including Zuiko's), but I've forgotten all the details.....
> 
> I guess that can be seen as a major slip in the 10-step-programme to
> recovery. But, on the other hand, a major step towards the "getting all
> the olympus-gear" award. He who has the most gear when he dies wins,
> right? ;)
> 
> On a serious side, I am probably going to thin out some of the things, in
> particulary those thrid-party lenses among the above, as well as what I
> will get in double. Once I get things in, I will put together a list (and
> get some representative photos) of the stuff I wish to part with. 
> 
> However, the guy with all the Olympus-gear is also trying to part with his
> OM4. I think he anticipates about USD115 or something for it, and it is
> described to be in good condition, also cosmetically. I do not know if it
> is the new "non-battery-eating" model or not (can find out, though). If
> anyone are interrested, I can provide a contact to the gentleman (No
> relation to seller other than the purchases described above)
> 
> So....I guess I have to start the 10-step programme all over. Where's
> Chris O'Neil when I need him....
> 
> Ahh, well....let's see: I can excuse the 135mm's by saying that I needed
> to evaluate their usage for portraitures (per the recent discussions on
> the list on this topic), and the macro-stuff...ehhh....well, I *could*
> start growing really really small mineature bonsais....uhmm.....help me
> out here, I need justifications....;)
> 
> Regards
> 
> --thomas
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 
> 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz