Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT Debatable (was OT Philosophy)

Subject: Re: [OM] OT Debatable (was OT Philosophy)
From: Jim Brokaw <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:13:20 -0800
on 1/22/02 10:12 PM, Chris Barker at imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> debatable
> 
> Chris
> 
> At 14:57 +1100 23/1/02, andrew fildes wrote:
>>> Doesn't "debatable" have only 2 e's?
>>> 
>>> Larry
>>> 
>>> andrew fildes wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> If axioms are in themselves debateable,
>> 
>> 
>> Damn - I'm always doing that! Debateabl, of course.
>> AndrewF
>> 

Actually, I think it's pretty clear, no question at all really... except to
allow for for regional variations e.g. 'color' and 'colour'... Then there's
always purposeful spelling, to add 'color' (or maybe I mean 'flavour') to
writing.
-- 

Jim Brokaw
OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney... 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz