Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-1 -- a different metering question

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-1 -- a different metering question
From: Roger Wesson <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 18:31:24 +0000
True enough, but as you can never be more than half a stop away from the
'ideal' exposure (which of course is a very arbitrary thing anyway), I
don't think it'll ever matter.  I can't imagine there's any film out
there that can't tolerate half a stop of over/underexposure.

But, if you're striving for perfection, you can set the aperture between
stops.  It'll close down to whatever it's set to, whether that coincides
with a marked stop or not.  Shutter speed doesn't work the same way,
though, and you can only get the marked values.

Roger

"Daniel J. Mitchell" wrote:
> 
> (I compared the OM1 against my known-to-be-working OM2, and the OM1 thinks I
> should have the shutter about four times as fast as the OM2, so I guess I'll
> need to do the battery thing).
> 
>  Question: as the OM1 only has a fixed number of settings for aperture (at
> least, most lenses are like this), and a fixed number of settings for
> shutter speed, doesn't this mean I can almost never get the right exposure?
> 
>  Say I'm at f8, and the 'perfect' amount of time to leave the shutter open
> for is 1/400th of a second. There's no way to get that -- I can get 1/500th
> or 1/250th, but not 1/400th, because the speed dial doesn't have that
> option. If it happens that the right speed is on the dial, that's great, but
> it seems like the majority of the time it'll be between two settings.
> 
>  Presumably this is something I don't worry about, and just try and get as
> close as I can?
> 
>  -- dan
> 
>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz