Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Extension tubes (was Bellows?)

Subject: Re: [OM] Extension tubes (was Bellows?)
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 21:42:58 +0000
At 02:06 2/2/02, Moose wrote:
The Vivitars are well built and work fine. They are different lengths than the Olys. Viv= 12, 20 & 36mm, Oly = 7, 14 & 25mm. Someone, perhaps John Lind, recently propounded on the reasons for the differences. I use An Oly 7mm plus the Vivitar set.

The OM tube lengths were selected to allow continuous magnification using combinations of the tubes plus the focusing ring on the 50mm Zuiko lenses.

I have "deduced" from this the Vivitar tubes are designed for a longer lens; likely about 85-90mm.

My Logic:
The focus ring on a prime will extend the lens about 1/7th its focal length farther from the film plane.
7 x 12mm = 84mm; 12mm being the shortest tube in the Vivitar AT-21 tube set.

Why "non-macro" primes do not extend much beyond 1/7th focal length:
Nearly all primes are focused to a distance closer than infinity by extending the entire lens cell farther from the film plane. As a result, the lens' image circle gets bigger as you focus closer. This spreads the same light over a larger area. Macro lenses are designed to compensate for this; non-macro lenses do not. The limit before overall falloff starts to approach 1/4 to 1/3 stop is about 1/7th the lens' focal length.

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz