Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Extension tubes (was Bellows?)

Subject: Re: [OM] Extension tubes (was Bellows?)
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 23:49:32 +0000
At 05:14 2/6/02, you wrote:
I think smaller hole is not a problem unless you use the 80/4 or
135/4.5 with the tubes. Tube with smaller hole may not fit the lenses.

C.H.Ling

The lenses C.H.Ling listed are two of the specialized "bellows mount" lenses that *must* be used mounted on tubes or bellows. They cannot be mounted "standalone" on a body (unlike the 50/3.5, 50/2 and 90/2 macro lenses which can be). Otherwise it shouldn't be a problem. My Vivitar set is similar with a smaller "hole" than the OM tubes have.

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz