And Cheers to you also, Ian. By both, I was, in this particular case,
referring to the comparison between the T-18 and the T-20. I do agree
with your statements though. And I too have several of the flashes (3 x
T-32, 5 x T-20, 1 x T-18, 1 x T-10, 1 x T-28 dual). And to reiterate,
of all these flashes, the T-18 is only more useful (versatile) than the
T-10. Except for macro work of course, and there the T-10 does a much
better job.
Rand E.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ian Manners wrote:
>
> Hi Rand
>
> >I have both, it would take the somewhat expensive and difficult to find
> >T-20 Auto Connector. And after all that, a T-20 will still out perform
> >it in almost every way for less trouble and money.
>
> I to have both T20 and T32, (3 x T32, 1 x T20, 1 x T10).
>
> The T20 Auto Connector can also be mounted on a tripod (I have
> one :), so you would need one of these with the cord, wereas the
> T32 only requires the cord, and is a better flash.
>
> The T20 Auto Connector's do come up on eBay every now and
> then, I just bought another one last week, as I use them on
> tripods with the T32's.
>
> Cheers
> Ian Manners
>
> PGP Public Key Fingerprint= 3639 E3AD 8897 3E9A D68D C340 8D01 2D80 6117 B593
>
> MS-DOS isn't dead, it just smells that way.
> -- Henry Spencer
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|