Wayne Culberson wrote:
>
> I have found that I got some out of focus shots with the MJU as well,
> especially if the subject isn't centered, and you haven't used spot focus
> (spot focus is of course slower and worse than manual focus imho). But
> isn't that the case with most any auto focus camera? I assumed it is, but
> don't know from experience as the MJU is the only auto focus I own, and the
> only one I want, at least right now.
The out focus pictures I got were with reasonable large object well
centred, mostly family shots.
>I just assumed some out of focus pics
> is the price you pay as a trade off for being able to grab a shot faster,
> etc. (And I'm thinking, if a 35mm lens has off focus shots, what would be
> the case with a camera with a longer lens?)
>
> Other differences, MJU has faster shutter speeds, 1/2000 versus 1/500. Also
> closer focus distance. Still talking apples and oranges. Both are good. But
> I don't carry oranges in my pocket. MJU is best for a pocket camera most of
> the time imho. .02 cdn worth, worth even less today.
> Wayne
>
The shutter speed of MJU II is 1/1000s not 1/2000s and the min
aperture of MJU II is larger. Closer focus is better than XA though.
C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|